Sustainable investment: harnessing the power of pensions
UK pension schemes control £1.6 trillion of assets, putting pension scheme trustees in a position of great influence, which should not be underestimated.
Building Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) into investment decision-making has grown in prominence in recent years, but there still exists widespread confusion between responsible, sustainable and impact investing approaches. In this briefing note we explain the difference, and demonstrate why moving away from a traditional investment approach need not be considered a charitable exercise, but rather one motivated by earning stable returns over a longer time horizon.
The society we live in has an increasing awareness of sustainability and society is starting to demand more from corporations and governments.
Companies are increasingly being confronted about how they deal with environmental issues such as climate change and pollution; social issues such as labour rights and data privacy; and governance issues around how a company is run. Governments have a track record for incentivising corporate behaviour by taxing, regulating or legislating against activities that society deems undesirable. This creates new costs and new risks for investors. Examples of this include the progressive clamping down of coal-fired power stations which will be phased out of the UK by 2025 or the tightening emissions regulations around petrol and diesel cars.
However, these issues don’t just relate to environmental considerations. There are a whole host of issues that society is growing less tolerant of which investors will be affected by. For instance, Facebook’s record fine of $5bn for its part in the misuse of personal data in the 2016 US election. This is an issue that Mark Zuckerberg himself admitted would have been difficult to foresee in the early days of Facebook, given it is primarily a website for friends to share news and pictures.
In this context, ESG considerations are no longer a ‘nice to have’ for a company, as they present financially material risks to its ability to generate sustainable long term returns. Asset owners such as pension schemes and other institutional investors have an important role to play in driving improvement. Furthermore, ignoring the risks posed by climate change could have consequences more serious than eroding investment returns. As described by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England, ‘climate change is a significant risk for global financial stability’.
Institutional investors are in the spotlight for policy makers due to the sheer size of assets they control. We expect this area to continue to receive increasing attention in the form of future legislation around how pension schemes themselves are governed, such as the DWP requirements that were introduced in October 2019 and further requirements that will come into play in October 2020. Similarly the updated 2020 Stewardship Code by the Financial Reporting Council has been extended to include asset owners such as pension schemes along with an increased focus on ESG considerations within stewardship.
"Investing responsibly is just a matter of common sense and every profit motivated investor should be doing it." - Sarita Gosrani, Head of ESG, XPS
What is your investment approach?
There is lot of confusion over the different ‘ESG’ approaches to investment. We have simplified this complex area into four broad categories:
At our client conferences in October and November we asked a total of 400 pension scheme trustees and corporates their approach to climate change:
What can schemes do?4 ways of putting ESG into practice
There are a number of practical steps that schemes can take to firmly embed ESG within their approach:
"The days of traditional investing are gone. The world is changing and the way we invest must change." - Simeon Willis, Chief Investment Officer, XPS
Taking progressive steps is vital if pension schemes are to start using their influence.
Does being responsible erode investment returns?
There has been a general perception that taking a responsible approach to investment naturally leads to a trade off in terms of returns.
There have been a number of detailed studies, including MSCI, that have found the opposite to be the case. An example of this is the performance of the FTSE4Good index, an ESG tilted index with some exclusions.
Compared to the FTSE all world index the FTSE4GOOD outperformance has been surprisingly consistent over a sustained period of time.
Despite historical outperformance, an ESG weighted index should not be an expected source of outperformance. We do believe however, that responsible investment holds the key to better market performance overall, by holding companies to a higher standard. This will lead to better investment decisions and these good practices feeding through to the wider market so a lot of the benefit will be observable in a better overall market index return.
XPS believes that taking a sustainable approach will be of growing importance for many of our clients and to assist them we are awarding funds a ‘sustainable’ designation where the fund demonstrates the right combination of attributes. Our vision is to offer clients an independently vetted sustainable choice across all asset classes.
These issues affect DB and DC schemes in different ways, but looking at this issue for all the managers you employ will be important. In DC it could prove a key area of driving engagement with your membership.
We continue to see a full spectrum of approaches employed by fund managers ranging from those that are very strong and leading the way, to those that are some way behind. However, our view is that as a whole, the industry has some way to come.